| dc.contributor.author | Tőkés, Tímea | |
| dc.contributor.author | Torgyik, László | |
| dc.contributor.author | Szentmártoni, Gyöngyvér | |
| dc.contributor.author | Somlai K | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tóth, Andrea | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kulka, Janina | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dank, Magdolna | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-21T06:31:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-09-21T06:31:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier | 84928588354 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | pagination=695-703; journalVolume=98; journalIssueNumber=6; journalTitle=PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING; | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/3509 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.02.012 | |
| dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: Primary systemic therapy (PST) followed by surgery is the standard initial treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). However, some patients are averse to mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery and do not consent to these procedures. The reasons for this controversial decision, the factors influencing the decision-making and optimal solutions for decision aiding need to be investigated. METHODS: We addressed these questions by a review of literature on the possibilities associated with different patient choices and subsequent treatment options in relation to LABC. RESULTS: A total of 5 reviews and 22 clinical studies were summarized in relation to decision making and the most successful decision aids. A discussion is given of the issues of those few patients who cannot be convinced to undergo surgery. CONCLUSION: Currently there is no guideline for the treatment of patients who reject the surgical procedures after PST. Medical oncologists should be able to apply decision aid modalities in a personalized manner to give all needed information to their patients thereby ensuring a deliberate decision-making process, facilitating acceptance of a need for surgery, and thus improving the chances of prolonged survival. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Currently multidisciplinary tumor boards are the most suitable decision aids in oncological practice. | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | urn:issn:0738-3991 | |
| dc.title | Primary systemic therapy for breast cancer: Does the patient's involvement in decision-making create a new future? | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.date.updated | 2016-06-09T12:39:01Z | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.identifier.mtmt | 2871858 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 000355022700003 | |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 25749023 | |
| dc.contributor.department | SE/AOK/I/II. Sz. Patológiai Intézet | |
| dc.contributor.department | SE/AOK/K/I. Sz. Belgyógyászati Klinika | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Semmelweis Egyetem |