| dc.contributor.author | Streit S | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gussekloo J | |
| dc.contributor.author | Burman RA | |
| dc.contributor.author | Collins C | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kitanovska BG | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gintere S | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gomez Bravo R | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hoffmann K | |
| dc.contributor.author | Iftode C | |
| dc.contributor.author | Johansen KL | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kerse N | |
| dc.contributor.author | Koskela TH | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pestic SK | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kurpas D | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mallen CD | |
| dc.contributor.author | Maisonneuve H | |
| dc.contributor.author | Merlo C | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mueller Y | |
| dc.contributor.author | Muth C | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ornelas RH | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ster MP | |
| dc.contributor.author | Petrazzuoli F | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rosemann T | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sattler M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Svadlenkova Z | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tatsioni A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Thulesius H | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tkachenko V | |
| dc.contributor.author | Torzsa, Péter | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsopra R | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tuz C | |
| dc.contributor.author | Verschoor M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Viegas RPA | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vinker S | |
| dc.contributor.author | de Waal MWM | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zeller A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rodondi N | |
| dc.contributor.author | Poortvliet RKE | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-26T07:14:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-06-26T07:14:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | pagination=89-98; journalVolume=36; journalIssueNumber=1; journalTitle=SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/4864 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | doi:10.1080/02813432.2018.1426142 | |
| dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: We previously found large variations in general practitioner (GP) hypertension treatment probability in oldest-old (>80 years) between countries. We wanted to explore whether differences in country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden and life expectancy could explain the differences. DESIGN: This is a survey study using case-vignettes of oldest-old patients with different comorbidities and blood pressure levels. An ecological multilevel model analysis was performed. SETTING: GP respondents from European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) countries, Brazil and New Zeeland. SUBJECTS: This study included 2543 GPs from 29 countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: GP treatment probability to start or not start antihypertensive treatment based on responses to case-vignettes; either low (<50% started treatment) or high (>/=50% started treatment). CVD burden is defined as ratio of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost due to ischemic heart disease and/or stroke and total DALYs lost per country; life expectancy at age 60 and prevalence of oldest-old per country. RESULTS: Of 1947 GPs (76%) responding to all vignettes, 787 (40%) scored high treatment probability and 1160 (60%) scored low. GPs in high CVD burden countries had higher odds of treatment probability (OR 3.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.00-4.57); in countries with low life expectancy at 60, CVD was associated with high treatment probability (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.12-4.25); but not in countries with high life expectancy (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.56-1.98). CONCLUSIONS: GPs' choice to treat/not treat hypertension in oldest-old was explained by differences in country-specific health characteristics. GPs in countries with high CVD burden and low life expectancy at age 60 were most likely to treat hypertension in oldest-old. Key Points * General practitioners (GPs) are in a clinical dilemma when deciding whether (or not) to treat hypertension in the oldest-old (>80 years of age). * In this study including 1947 GPs from 29 countries, we found that a high country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden (i.e. myocardial infarction and/or stroke) was associated with a higher GP treatment probability in patients aged >80 years. * However, the association was modified by country-specific life expectancy at age 60. While there was a positive association for GPs in countries with a low life expectancy at age 60, there was no association in countries with a high life expectancy at age 60. * These findings help explaining some of the large variation seen in the decision as to whether or not to treat hypertension in the oldest-old. | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | urn:issn:0281-3432 | |
| dc.title | Burden of cardiovascular disease across 29 countries and GPs' decision to treat hypertension in oldest-old | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.date.updated | 2018-02-19T14:43:17Z | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.identifier.mtmt | 3336873 | |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 29366388 | |
| dc.contributor.department | SE/AOK/K/Családorvosi Tanszék | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Semmelweis Egyetem |