dc.contributor.author |
Streit S |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Gussekloo J |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Burman RA |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Collins C |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kitanovska BG |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Gintere S |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Gomez Bravo R |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hoffmann K |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Iftode C |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Johansen KL |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kerse N |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Koskela TH |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Pestic SK |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kurpas D |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mallen CD |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Maisonneuve H |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Merlo C |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mueller Y |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Muth C |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ornelas RH |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ster MP |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Petrazzuoli F |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Rosemann T |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sattler M |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Svadlenkova Z |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Tatsioni A |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Thulesius H |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Tkachenko V |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Torzsa, Péter |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Tsopra R |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Tuz C |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Verschoor M |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Viegas RPA |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Vinker S |
|
dc.contributor.author |
de Waal MWM |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Zeller A |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Rodondi N |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Poortvliet RKE |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-06-26T07:14:48Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-06-26T07:14:48Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
pagination=89-98;
journalVolume=36;
journalIssueNumber=1;
journalTitle=SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/4864 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
doi:10.1080/02813432.2018.1426142 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
OBJECTIVES: We previously found large variations in general practitioner (GP) hypertension treatment probability in oldest-old (>80 years) between countries. We wanted to explore whether differences in country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden and life expectancy could explain the differences. DESIGN: This is a survey study using case-vignettes of oldest-old patients with different comorbidities and blood pressure levels. An ecological multilevel model analysis was performed. SETTING: GP respondents from European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) countries, Brazil and New Zeeland. SUBJECTS: This study included 2543 GPs from 29 countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: GP treatment probability to start or not start antihypertensive treatment based on responses to case-vignettes; either low (<50% started treatment) or high (>/=50% started treatment). CVD burden is defined as ratio of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost due to ischemic heart disease and/or stroke and total DALYs lost per country; life expectancy at age 60 and prevalence of oldest-old per country. RESULTS: Of 1947 GPs (76%) responding to all vignettes, 787 (40%) scored high treatment probability and 1160 (60%) scored low. GPs in high CVD burden countries had higher odds of treatment probability (OR 3.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.00-4.57); in countries with low life expectancy at 60, CVD was associated with high treatment probability (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.12-4.25); but not in countries with high life expectancy (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.56-1.98). CONCLUSIONS: GPs' choice to treat/not treat hypertension in oldest-old was explained by differences in country-specific health characteristics. GPs in countries with high CVD burden and low life expectancy at age 60 were most likely to treat hypertension in oldest-old. Key Points * General practitioners (GPs) are in a clinical dilemma when deciding whether (or not) to treat hypertension in the oldest-old (>80 years of age). * In this study including 1947 GPs from 29 countries, we found that a high country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden (i.e. myocardial infarction and/or stroke) was associated with a higher GP treatment probability in patients aged >80 years. * However, the association was modified by country-specific life expectancy at age 60. While there was a positive association for GPs in countries with a low life expectancy at age 60, there was no association in countries with a high life expectancy at age 60. * These findings help explaining some of the large variation seen in the decision as to whether or not to treat hypertension in the oldest-old. |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
urn:issn:0281-3432 |
|
dc.title |
Burden of cardiovascular disease across 29 countries and GPs' decision to treat hypertension in oldest-old |
|
dc.type |
Journal Article |
|
dc.date.updated |
2018-02-19T14:43:17Z |
|
dc.language.rfc3066 |
en |
|
dc.identifier.mtmt |
3336873 |
|
dc.identifier.pubmed |
29366388 |
|
dc.contributor.department |
SE/AOK/K/Családorvosi Tanszék |
|
dc.contributor.institution |
Semmelweis Egyetem |
|