dc.contributor.author |
Szijártó Attila |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Fujimoto Y |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Izumi K |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Shinji U |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-12-09T14:16:16Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-12-09T14:16:16Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
|
dc.identifier |
84883320753 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
pagination=1417-1425;
journalVolume=154;
journalIssueNumber=36;
journalTitle=ORVOSI HETILAP; |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/509 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
doi:10.1556/OH.2013.29698 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Introduction: Due to the limited number of cadaver donors, adult living liver donor transplantation became an alternative for liver transplantation. During living liver donor transplantation, the safety and uncomplicated recovery of the donor are as important as the appropriate volume and weight of the donated graft. The middle hepatic vein causes a significant dilemma, due to the special anatomical position. The reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein branches supplying S5, S8 is suggested when the anatomically right liver lobe is transplanted. Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate the requirements of the reconstruction of middle hepatic vein and to give an accurate description about the discrepancy between the portal vein in- and outflow. Method: The authors analyzed the liver anatomic characteristics of 130 donors undergoing living liver donor transplantation with the use of MeVis software. The so-called porto-hepatic disparity index (shift) was introduced. Results: The right hepatic vein was dominant in 64.6% of all cases, while the left hepatic vein was never observed to be dominant. The territories of V5 and V8 were responsible for the 33.2+/-8.9% of the right hepatic lobe area. The correlation between portal venous territory and vein dominancy were as follows: R2 = 0.7811 in the left liver lobe; R(2) = 0.5463 in the area of middle hepatic vein and R(2) = 0.5843 in the case of the right hepatic vein. The average value of the shift was 28.2%. Conclusions: The differences among the pattern of portal in- and hepatic outflow is an important issue that should be taken into consideration when deciding the necessity for reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein. Orv. Hetil., 2013, 154, 1417-1425. |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
urn:issn:0030-6002 |
|
dc.title |
Az élődonoros májtranszplantáció speciális kérdései [Special considerations of living liver donor transplantation] |
|
dc.type |
Journal Article |
|
dc.date.updated |
2014-11-11T12:58:15Z |
|
dc.language.rfc3066 |
hu |
|
dc.identifier.mtmt |
2401455 |
|
dc.identifier.pubmed |
23996923 |
|
dc.contributor.department |
SE/ÁOK/K/I. Sz. Sebészeti Klinika |
|
dc.contributor.institution |
Semmelweis Egyetem |
|