Egyszerű nézet

dc.contributor.author Fábián, Melinda
dc.contributor.author Rencz, Fanni
dc.contributor.author Krenács, Tibor
dc.contributor.author Brodszky, Valentin
dc.contributor.author Hársing, Judit
dc.contributor.author Németh, Krisztián
dc.contributor.author Balogh, Petra
dc.contributor.author Kárpáti, Sarolta
dc.date.accessioned 2018-06-11T08:29:26Z
dc.date.available 2018-06-11T08:29:26Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier 85021375360
dc.identifier.citation pagination=1453-1461; journalVolume=31; journalIssueNumber=9; journalTitle=JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY;
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/5550
dc.identifier.uri doi:10.1111/jdv.14304
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: The hormone sensitivity of melanoma and the role of 'classical' estrogen receptor (ER) alpha and beta in tumor progression have been intensively studied with rather contradictory results. The presence of 'non-classical' G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) has not been investigated on human melanoma tissues. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the expression of GPER, ERalpha and ERbeta in pregnancy-associated (PAM) and in non-pregnancy associated (NPAM) melanomas in correlation with traditional prognostic markers and disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS: Receptor protein levels were tested using immunohistochemistry in 81 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded melanoma tissues. PAMs (n=38) were compared with age- and Breslow thickness-matched cases (n=43) including non-pregnant women (NPAM-W) (n=22) and men (NPAM-M) (n=21). The association between receptor expression and DFS was analyzed by uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: GPER was detected both in PAMs and NPAMs. In 39 of the 41 (95.1%) GPER positive melanomas GPER and ERbeta were co-expressed. GPER/ERbeta positive melanomas were significantly more common in PAM compared to NPAM (p=0.0001) with no significant difference between genders (p=0.4383). In PAMs the distribution of GPER and ERbeta was similar (78.4% versus 81.6%; p=0.8504), while in NPAM ERbeta was the representative ER (60.5% versus 27.9%; p=0.0010) without gender difference (59.1% versus 61.9%). GPER/ERbeta positive melanomas were associated with lower Breslow thickness, lower mitotic rate and higher presence of peritumoral lymphocyte infiltration (PLI) compared to GPER/ERbeta negative cases (p=0.0156, p=0.0036 and p=0.0001) predicting a better DFS (HR=0.785, 95% CI 0.582-1.058). Despite the significantly higher frequency of GPER and ERbeta expression in PAM, no significant difference was found in DFS between PAM and NPAM. All but one case failed to show ERalpha expression. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of GPER and its simultaneous expression with ERbeta can serve as a new prognostic indicator in a significant subpopulation of melanoma patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
dc.relation.ispartof urn:issn:0926-9959
dc.title Expression of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor, GPER in melanoma and in pregnancy-associated melanoma
dc.type Journal Article
dc.date.updated 2018-06-06T12:49:33Z
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.identifier.mtmt 3218459
dc.identifier.wos 000417421400040
dc.identifier.pubmed 28467693
dc.contributor.department SE/Doktori Iskola
dc.contributor.department SE/AOK/I/IISZPI/MTA-SE Molekuláris Onkológia Kutatócsoport
dc.contributor.department SE/AOK/K/Bőr-, Nemikórtani és Bőronkológiai Klinika
dc.contributor.department SE/AOK/I/I. Sz. Patológiai és Kísérleti Rákkutató Intézet
dc.contributor.institution Semmelweis Egyetem


Kapcsolódó fájlok:

A fájl jelenleg csak egyetemi IP címről érhető el.

Megtekintés/Megnyitás

Ez a rekord az alábbi gyűjteményekben szerepel:

Egyszerű nézet