Egyszerű nézet

dc.contributor.author Ryska A
dc.contributor.author Berzinec P
dc.contributor.author Brcic L
dc.contributor.author Cufer T
dc.contributor.author Dziadziuszko R
dc.contributor.author Gottfried M
dc.contributor.author Kovalszky, Ilona
dc.contributor.author Olszewski W
dc.contributor.author Oz B
dc.contributor.author Plank L
dc.contributor.author Tímár, József
dc.date.accessioned 2018-09-18T10:26:18Z
dc.date.available 2018-09-18T10:26:18Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation pagination=269, pages: 8; journalVolume=18; journalTitle=BMC CANCER;
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/5940
dc.identifier.uri doi:10.1186/s12885-018-4023-4
dc.description.abstract Background: The introduction of targeted treatments for subsets of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has highlighted the importance of accurate molecular diagnosis to determine if an actionable genetic alteration is present. Few data are available for Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) on mutation rates, testing rates, and compliance with testing guidelines. Methods: A questionnaire about molecular testing and NSCLC management was distributed to relevant specialists in nine CEE countries, and pathologists were asked to provide the results of EGFR and ALK testing over a 1-year period. Results: A very high proportion of lung cancer cases are confirmed histologically/cytologically (75-100%), and molecular testing of NSCLC samples has been established in all evaluated CEE countries in 2014. Most countries follow national or international guidelines on which patients to test for EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements. In most centers at that time, testing was undertaken on request of the clinician rather than on the preferred reflex basis. Immunohistochemistry, followed by fluorescent in situ hybridization confirmation of positive cases, has been widely adopted for ALK testing in the region. Limited reimbursement is a significant barrier to molecular testing in the region and a disincentive to reflex testing. Multidisciplinary tumor boards are established in most of the countries and centers, with 75-100% of cases being discussed at a multidisciplinary tumor board at specialized centers. Conclusions: Molecular testing is established throughout the CEE region, but improved and unbiased reimbursement remains a major challenge for the future. Increasing the number of patients reviewed by multidisciplinary boards outside of major centers and access to targeted therapy based on the result of molecular testing are other major challenges.
dc.relation.ispartof urn:issn:1471-2407
dc.title NSCLC molecular testing in Central and Eastern European countries
dc.type Journal Article
dc.date.updated 2018-07-19T11:08:02Z
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.identifier.mtmt 3377292
dc.identifier.wos 000427089100001
dc.identifier.pubmed 29523116
dc.contributor.department SE/AOK/I/I. Sz. Patológiai és Kísérleti Rákkutató Intézet
dc.contributor.institution Semmelweis Egyetem


Kapcsolódó fájlok:

A fájl jelenleg csak egyetemi IP címről érhető el.

Megtekintés/Megnyitás

Ez a rekord az alábbi gyűjteményekben szerepel:

Egyszerű nézet