Egyszerű nézet

dc.contributor.author Kiss, Zoltán
dc.contributor.author Tél, Bálint
dc.contributor.author Borbásné Farkas, Kornélia
dc.contributor.author Garami, András
dc.contributor.author Vincze, Áron
dc.contributor.author Bajor, Judit
dc.contributor.author Sarlós, Patrícia
dc.contributor.author Márta, Katalin
dc.contributor.author Erős, Adrienn
dc.contributor.author Mikó, Alexandra
dc.contributor.author Szakács, Zsolt
dc.contributor.author Pécsi, Dániel
dc.contributor.author Mátrai, Péter
dc.contributor.author Hegyi, Péter
dc.contributor.author Veres, Gábor
dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-01T09:07:09Z
dc.date.available 2018-10-01T09:07:09Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier 85050153938
dc.identifier.citation pagination=6-12; journalVolume=67; journalIssueNumber=1; journalTitle=JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION;
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/6038
dc.identifier.uri doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000001904
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to review the available data regarding eosinophil density in healthy tissue specimen originating from lower gastrointestinal segments to support suggested diagnostic cut-offs widely used in clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in three different databases. Calculations were made with Comprehensive MetaAnalysis software using random effects model. Cell number measurements were pooled using the random effects model and displayed on forest plots. Summary point estimations, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs), and 95% Prediction Intervals (PIs) were calculated. RESULTS: The cumulative mean cell numbers were 8.26 (95% CI: 3.49, 13.03) with PI of 0-25.32 for the duodenum, 11.51 (95% CI: 7.21, 15.82) with PI of 0-60.59 for the terminal ileum, and 11.10/HPF (95% CI: 9.11, 13.09) with PI of 0.96-21.23 in the large intestine and the rectum (HPF area = 0.2 mm). Previous studies included control patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional GI disorders. As mucosal eosinophils have a role in their pathomechanism, those patients should have been excluded. A critical point of interpreting reported data is that HPF is relative to the technical parameters of the microscopes, therefore it is important to report findings in cell/mm. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis does not support the higher (>20) or lower (<10) cut-off values for healthy tissue eosinophil number. In contrast to the esophagus, there is no normal cut-off eosinophil density in the small intestine and the colon. A prospective, multi-center study to establish normal mucosal eosinophil density is clearly needed.
dc.relation.ispartof urn:issn:0277-2116
dc.title Eosinophil Counts in the Small Intestine and Colon of Children Without Apparent Gastrointestinal Disease: a Meta-analysis.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.date.updated 2018-08-03T08:59:01Z
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.identifier.mtmt 3330485
dc.identifier.wos 000441421500010
dc.identifier.pubmed 29394213
dc.contributor.department PTE/Szentágothai János Kutatóközpont
dc.contributor.department SE/AOK/K/I. Sz. Gyermekgyógyászati Klinika
dc.contributor.institution Pécsi Tudományegyetem
dc.contributor.institution Semmelweis Egyetem


Kapcsolódó fájlok:

A fájl jelenleg csak egyetemi IP címről érhető el.

Megtekintés/Megnyitás

Ez a rekord az alábbi gyűjteményekben szerepel:

Egyszerű nézet