Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method

dc.contributor.author	Nagy, Zsolt András
dc.contributor.author	Simon, Botond
dc.contributor.author	Mennito, Anthony
dc.contributor.author	Evans, Zachary
dc.contributor.author	Renne, Walter
dc.contributor.author	Vág, János
dc.date.accessioned	2020-05-11T10:03:01Z
dc.date.available	2020-05-11T10:03:01Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.citation	journalVolume=20;journalIssueNumber=1;pagination=97, pages: 10;journalTitle=BMC ORAL HEALTH;journalAbbreviatedTitle=BMC ORAL HEALTH;
dc.identifier.uri	http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/8241
dc.identifier.uri	doi:10.1186/s12903-020-01090-x
dc.description.abstract	Intraoral scanner (IOS) accuracy is commonly evaluated using full-arch surface comparison, which fails to take into consideration the starting position of the scanning (scan origin). Previously a novel method was developed, which takes into account the scan origin and calculates the deviation of predefined identical points between references and test models. This method may reveal the error caused by stitching individual images during intraoral scan. This study aimed to validate the novel method by comparing the trueness of seven IOSs (Element 1, Element 2, Emerald, Omnicam, Planscan, Trios 3, CS 3600) to a physical impression digitized by laboratory scanner which lacks linear stitching problems.
dc.relation.ispartof	urn:issn:1472-6831
dc.title	Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method
dc.type	Journal Article
dc.date.updated	2020-04-08T12:55:42Z
dc.language.rfc3066	en
dc.rights.holder	NULL
dc.identifier.mtmt	31275072
dc.contributor.department	SE/FOK/Konzerváló Fogászati Klinika
dc.contributor.institution	Semmelweis Egyetem