Egyszerű nézet

dc.contributor.author Noori, Shahab
dc.contributor.author Ebrahimi, Mahmood
dc.contributor.author Luo, Huiwen
dc.contributor.author Seri, Istvan
dc.contributor.author Siassi, Bijan
dc.date.accessioned 2021-09-27T06:44:16Z
dc.date.available 2021-09-27T06:44:16Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier 85101788778
dc.identifier.citation journalVolume=38;journalIssueNumber=2;journalTitle=ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES;pagerange=217-221;journalAbbreviatedTitle=ECHOCARDIOGR-J CARD;
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/8933
dc.identifier.uri doi:10.1111/echo.14965
dc.description.abstract Introduction Simulators are increasingly used for training in echocardiography. However, there is no objective method to assess the skills acquired. Our objective was to develop and test an automated method to assess echocardiography skills. Methods To automate the image quality evaluation, we expanded our previously developed neonatal echocardiography simulator to enable recording of images of the 26 standard cuts and process the image quality. We then compared the automated and visual methods in scoring image quality of the echocardiograms obtained by 22 trainees. Results Each echocardiographic image representing a slice of a three-dimensional volume possesses 3 axes (X, Y, and Z) that correspond to the roll, pitch, and yaw angles of the transducer, respectively. Therefore, if the placement and orientation of the transducer are correct, the acquired image represents the appropriate cardiac window with the desired orientation in all 3 axes. The automated system gives a score of 0 if the transducer is not in the appropriate cardiac window. A score of 1, 2, or 3 is given if the image falls within the range of one, two, or three angles, respectively. There was no difference in the image quality score between automated and visual assessment methods (46.0 +/- 13.0 vs 45.1 +/- 14.4, P = .19). The two methods had excellent correlation (r = .95). The bias and precision were 0.9 and 8.8, respectively. Conclusions The automated method is comparable to visual method for assessment of image quality. The automated process allows for instantaneous feedback and has the potential to standardize assessment of echocardiography skills of trainees.
dc.format.extent 217-221
dc.relation.ispartof urn:issn:0742-2822 1540-8175
dc.title Development and validation of an automated assessment tool of echocardiography skills acquired on a neonatal simulator
dc.type Journal Article
dc.date.updated 2021-09-22T10:35:31Z
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.rights.holder NULL
dc.identifier.mtmt 31797055
dc.identifier.wos 000598526500001
dc.identifier.scopus 85101788778
dc.identifier.pubmed 33319414
dc.contributor.department SE/AOK/K/I. Sz. Gyermekgyógyászati Klinika
dc.contributor.institution Semmelweis Egyetem
dc.mtmt.swordnote Fetal and Neonatal Institute, Division of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, LAC+USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States First Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary Export Date: 17 May 2021 CODEN: ECAGE Correspondence Address: Noori, S.; Fetal and Neonatal Institute, United States; email: snoori@chla.usc.edu


Kapcsolódó fájlok:

A fájl jelenleg csak egyetemi IP címről érhető el.

Megtekintés/Megnyitás

Ez a rekord az alábbi gyűjteményekben szerepel:

Egyszerű nézet