Egyszerű nézet

dc.contributor.author Jung, Ronald Ernst
dc.contributor.author Mihatovic, Ilja
dc.contributor.author Cordaro, Luca
dc.contributor.author Windisch, Péter
dc.contributor.author Friedmann, Anton
dc.contributor.author Blanco, Carrion Juan
dc.contributor.author Sanz, Sanchez Ignacio
dc.contributor.author Hallman, Mats
dc.contributor.author Quirynen, Marc
dc.contributor.author Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-20T07:19:29Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-20T07:19:29Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier 85091163006
dc.identifier.citation journalVolume=31;journalIssueNumber=11;journalTitle=CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH;pagerange=1105-1115;journalAbbreviatedTitle=CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES;
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/9095
dc.identifier.uri doi:10.1111/clr.13657
dc.description.abstract Abstract Objectives The aim of the present randomized, controlled clinical multicenter trial was to compare a polyethylene glycol (PEG) and a native collagen membrane (BG) for simultaneous guided bone regeneration at bony dehiscence-type defects around bone level titanium implants. Material and methods The study enrolled 117 patients requiring implant treatment in the posterior maxilla or mandible with expected buccal bony dehiscence-type defects at the placed titanium implants. According to a parallel groups design, defects were filled with a synthetic bone filler and randomly assigned to either PEG or BG membrane. As primary parameter, the relative vertical bone fill was assessed at baseline and at re-entry after 6 months of healing. As secondary parameters, the marginal bone level (MBL) was assessed radiographically and soft tissue conditions were recorded up to 18 months postloading. Results Both groups showed comparable vertical bone fill revealing a relative change in defect height of 59.7% (PEG) and 64.4% (BG). The absolute mean reduction in defect size was 2.5 mm in the PEG group and 3.2 mm in the BG group. Although both groups revealed a statistically significant mean defect reduction (p < .001), a comparison between the two groups did not show statistical significances. The non-inferiority test with inferiority limit of ?5% could not be rejected, based on the 90% confidence interval of the differences of the two means with lower limit ?15.4%. After 18 months, an MBL increase of 0.45 ± 0.43 mm in the PEG group and 0.41 ± 0.81 mm in the BG group was detected (p < .001). Soft tissue complications were observed in both groups without showing statistical significance. Conclusions Both membranes supported bone regeneration at dehiscence-type defects and obtained vertical bone fill with a relative change in defect height of 59.7% (PEG) and 64.4% (BG); however, the non-inferiority of PEG could not be shown.
dc.format.extent 1105-1115
dc.relation.ispartof urn:issn:0905-7161
dc.title Comparison of a polyethylene glycol membrane and a collagen membrane for the treatment of bone dehiscence defects at bone level implants - A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial
dc.type Journal Article
dc.date.updated 2022-05-19T18:50:35Z
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.rights.holder NULL
dc.identifier.mtmt 31606112
dc.identifier.wos 000571248800001
dc.identifier.pubmed 32875638
dc.contributor.department SE/FOK/Parodontológiai Klinika
dc.contributor.institution Semmelweis Egyetem


Kapcsolódó fájlok:

A fájl jelenleg csak egyetemi IP címről érhető el.

Megtekintés/Megnyitás

Ez a rekord az alábbi gyűjteményekben szerepel:

Egyszerű nézet