Egyszerű nézet

dc.contributor.author Zuzak TJ
dc.contributor.author Boňková J
dc.contributor.author Careddu D
dc.contributor.author Garami, Miklós
dc.contributor.author Hadjipanayis A
dc.contributor.author Jazbec J
dc.contributor.author Merrick J
dc.contributor.author Miller J
dc.contributor.author Ozturk C
dc.contributor.author Persson IAL
dc.contributor.author Petrova G
dc.contributor.author Saz Peiró P
dc.contributor.author Schraub S
dc.contributor.author Simões-Wüst AP
dc.contributor.author Steinsbekk A
dc.contributor.author Stockert K
dc.contributor.author Stoimenova A
dc.contributor.author Styczynski J
dc.contributor.author Tzenova-Savova A
dc.contributor.author Ventegodt S
dc.contributor.author Vlieger AM
dc.contributor.author Längler A
dc.date.accessioned 2016-05-06T06:31:43Z
dc.date.available 2016-05-06T06:31:43Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier 84876158656
dc.identifier.citation pagination=S34-S47; journalVolume=21; journalIssueNumber=Suppl. 1; journalTitle=COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE;
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/2475
dc.identifier.uri doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2012.01.001
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Few data document the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Europe, with even fewer investigating use by children. Methods: A narrative, non-systematic review of CAM use in Europe was performed by combining data from published surveys with expert perspectives. Limitations created by a lack of representative studies, varying definitions of CAM use, and what qualifies as CAM in different countries was partially overcome by integrating local experts to summarise information available only in the national language and provide their perspectives about CAM availability, quality, use and popularity in their countries using a semi-structured questionnaire. Local and international published surveys were summarised, and the prevalence of CAM use was extrapolated. Results: Data from 20 European countries were available, representing 69% of the European population. Some data about CAM use by the general population were available for 90% of the examined countries, whereas peer-reviewed published surveys were available for only 60%. We extrapolated that 56% (range: 10-90%, adjusted for population size) of the European population in general had used CAM at least once in the past year. Surveys in CAM use by children were available for 55% of the investigated countries. The extrapolated prevalence of CAM use by children in Europe was 52% (range: 5-90%, adjusted for population size). Paediatric CAM experts reported an increasing awareness for and use of CAM in healthcare institutions. Conclusion: This precursor for further surveys indicates that CAM appears to be popular not only among adults in Europe, but also for children. Development of a pan-European definition of CAM use and CAM therapies are required to achieve surveys comparable between European countries. Additionally, more research investigating the efficacy and potential adverse effects of CAM therapies is needed because of increasing CAM use by children in Europe. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.relation.ispartof urn:issn:0965-2299
dc.title Use of complementary and alternative medicine by children in Europe
dc.type Journal Article
dc.date.updated 2015-11-20T13:17:13Z
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.identifier.mtmt 2031680
dc.identifier.wos 000318190100006
dc.contributor.department SE/AOK/K/II. Sz. Gyermekgyógyászati Klinika
dc.contributor.institution Semmelweis Egyetem


Kapcsolódó fájlok:

A fájl jelenleg csak egyetemi IP címről érhető el.

Megtekintés/Megnyitás

Ez a rekord az alábbi gyűjteményekben szerepel:

Egyszerű nézet