Egyszerű nézet

dc.contributor.author Kutyifa, Valentina
dc.contributor.author Pouleur AC
dc.contributor.author Knappe D
dc.contributor.author Al-Ahmad A
dc.contributor.author Gibinski M
dc.contributor.author Merkely, Béla Péter
dc.date.accessioned 2014-12-07T17:19:39Z
dc.date.available 2014-12-07T17:19:39Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier 84876100806
dc.identifier.citation pagination=432-444; journalVolume=6; journalIssueNumber=4; journalTitle=JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING;
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/456
dc.identifier.uri doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.12.008
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and the risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients enrolled in the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) trial. BACKGROUND: Intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony might be an important factor in ventricular arrhythmogenesis by enhancing electrical heterogeneity in heart failure patients. The effects of dyssynchrony have not yet been evaluated in a large cohort of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) patients. METHODS: LV dyssynchrony was measured at baseline and at 12-months by speckle-tracking echocardiography, defined as the standard deviation of time to peak systolic strain in 12 LV myocardial segments. The endpoint was the first VT/VF/death or VT/VF. LV dyssynchrony was evaluated in 764 left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients and in 312 non-LBBB patients. RESULTS: Baseline LV dyssynchrony was not predictive of VT/VF/death or VT/VF in LBBB or non-LBBB patients in either treatment arm. In CRT-D patients with LBBB, improvement in LV dyssynchrony over a year was associated with significantly lower incidence of VT/VF/death (p < 0.001) and VT/VF (p < 0.001) compared to ICD patients and to CRT-D patients with unchanged or worsening dyssynchrony. Among LBBB patients, 15% decrease in LV dyssynchrony was associated with lower risk of VT/VF/death (hazard ratio: 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.24 to 0.99, p = 0.049) and VT/VF (hazard ratio: 0.30, 95% confidence interval: 0.12 to 0.77, p = 0.009) as compared to ICD patients. Patients without LBBB receiving CRT-D did not show reduction in VT/VF/death or in VT/VF in relation to improving dyssynchrony when evaluating cumulative event rates or risk of events. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline LV dyssynchrony did not predict VT/VF/death or VT/VF in mild heart failure patients with or without LBBB. CRT-induced improvement of LV dyssynchrony was associated with significant reduction of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with LBBB. (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [MADIT-CRT]; NCT00180271).
dc.relation.ispartof urn:issn:1936-878X
dc.title Dyssynchrony and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias
dc.type Journal Article
dc.date.updated 2014-11-10T14:12:07Z
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.identifier.mtmt 2272699
dc.identifier.wos 000317842300003
dc.identifier.pubmed 23579010
dc.contributor.department SE/ÁOK/K/Kardiológiai Központ, Kardiológia Tanszék (névváltozás: 2012-től Kardiológiai Tanszék-Kardiológiai Központ)
dc.contributor.institution Semmelweis Egyetem


Kapcsolódó fájlok:

A fájl jelenleg csak egyetemi IP címről érhető el.

Megtekintés/Megnyitás

Ez a rekord az alábbi gyűjteményekben szerepel:

Egyszerű nézet