Egyszerű nézet

dc.contributor.author Soós, Sándor
dc.contributor.author Jeszenői, Norbert
dc.contributor.author Darvas, Katalin
dc.contributor.author Harsányi, László
dc.date.accessioned 2018-09-18T09:19:26Z
dc.date.available 2018-09-18T09:19:26Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier 84994468972
dc.identifier.citation pagination=443, pages: 8; journalVolume=16; journalIssueNumber=1; journalTitle=BMC COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE;
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/5950
dc.identifier.uri doi:10.1186/s12906-016-1426-0
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Despite their worldwide popularity the question of using non-conventional treatments is a source of controversy among medical professionals. Although these methods may have potential benefits it presents a problem when patients use non-conventional treatments in the perioperative period without informing their attending physician about it and this may cause adverse events and complications. To prevent this, physicians need to have a profound knowledge about non-conventional treatments. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was distributed among surgeons and anaesthesiologists working in Hungarian university clinics and in selected city or county hospitals. Questionnaires were distributed by post, online or in person. Altogether 258 questionnaires were received from 22 clinical and hospital departments. RESULTS: Anaesthesiologists and surgeons use reflexology, Traditional Chinese Medicine, herbal medicine and manual therapy most frequently in their clinical practice. Traditional Chinese Medicine was considered to be the most scientifically sound method, while homeopathy was perceived as the least well-grounded method. Neural therapy was the least well-known method among our subjects. Among the subjects of our survey only 3.1 % of perioperative care physicians had some qualifications in non-conventional medicine, 12.4 % considered themselves to be well-informed in this topic and 48.4 % would like to study some complementary method. Women were significantly more interested in alternative treatments than men, p = 0.001427; OR: 2.2765. Anaesthesiologists would be significantly more willing to learn non-conventional methods than surgeons. 86.4 % of the participants thought that non-conventional treatments should be evaluated from the point of view of evidence. Both surgeons and anaesthesiologists accept the application of integrative medicine and they also approve of the idea of teaching these methods at universities. CONCLUSIONS: According to perioperative care physicians, non-conventional methods should be evaluated based on evidence. They also expressed a willingness to learn about those treatments that meet the criteria of evidence and apply these in their clinical practice.
dc.relation.ispartof urn:issn:1472-6882
dc.title Complementary and alternative medicine: attitudes, knowledge and use among surgeons and anaesthesiologists in Hungary
dc.type Journal Article
dc.date.updated 2018-07-19T11:33:51Z
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.identifier.mtmt 3137195
dc.identifier.wos 000387073900003
dc.identifier.pubmed 27821154
dc.contributor.department ELTE/TTK/Bio_I/Genetikai Tanszék
dc.contributor.department PTE/Szentágothai János Kutatóközpont
dc.contributor.department SE/AOK/K/Aneszteziológiai és Intenzív Terápiás Klinika
dc.contributor.department SE/AOK/K/I. Sz. Sebészeti Klinika
dc.contributor.institution Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
dc.contributor.institution Pécsi Tudományegyetem
dc.contributor.institution Semmelweis Egyetem


Kapcsolódó fájlok:

A fájl jelenleg csak egyetemi IP címről érhető el.

Megtekintés/Megnyitás

Ez a rekord az alábbi gyűjteményekben szerepel:

Egyszerű nézet