Egyszerű nézet

dc.contributor.author Virtanen M
dc.contributor.author Vahtera J
dc.contributor.author Head J
dc.contributor.author Dray-Spira R
dc.contributor.author Okuloff A
dc.contributor.author Tabák, Ádám
dc.contributor.author Goldberg M
dc.contributor.author Ervasti J
dc.contributor.author Jokela M
dc.contributor.author Singh-Manoux A
dc.contributor.author Pentti J
dc.contributor.author Zins M
dc.contributor.author Kivimaki M
dc.date.accessioned 2018-09-13T07:26:54Z
dc.date.available 2018-09-13T07:26:54Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier 84957109123
dc.identifier.citation pagination=e0143184, pages: 14; journalVolume=10; journalIssueNumber=11; journalTitle=PLOS ONE;
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.semmelweis.hu//handle/123456789/5983
dc.identifier.uri doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143184
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Studies of work disability in diabetes have examined diabetes as a homogeneous disease. We sought to identify subgroups among persons with diabetes based on potential risk factors for work disability. METHODS: Participants were 2,445 employees with diabetes from three prospective cohorts (the Finnish Public Sector study, the GAZEL study, and the Whitehall II study). Work disability was ascertained via linkage to registers of sickness absence and disability pensions during a follow-up of 4 years. Study-specific latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups according to prevalent comorbid disease and health-risk behaviours. Study-specific associations with work disability at follow-up were pooled using fixed-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Separate latent class analyses for men and women in each cohort supported a two-class solution with one subgroup (total n = 1,086; 44.4%) having high prevalence of chronic somatic diseases, psychological symptoms, obesity, physical inactivity and abstinence from alcohol and the other subgroup (total n = 1,359; 55.6%) low prevalence of these factors. In the adjusted meta-analyses, participants in the 'high-risk' group had more work disability days (pooled rate ratio = 1.66, 95% CI 1.38-1.99) and more work disability episodes (pooled rate ratio = 1.33, 95% CI 1.21-1.46). These associations were similar in men and women, younger and older participants, and across occupational groups. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes is not a homogeneous disease in terms of work disability risk. Approximately half of people with diabetes are assigned to a subgroup characterised by clustering of comorbid health conditions, obesity, physical inactivity, abstinence of alcohol, and associated high risk of work disability; the other half to a subgroup characterised by a more favourable risk profile.
dc.relation.ispartof urn:issn:1932-6203
dc.title Work Disability among Employees with Diabetes: Latent Class Analysis of Risk Factors in Three Prospective Cohort Studies
dc.type Journal Article
dc.date.updated 2018-07-20T07:24:44Z
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.identifier.mtmt 3047940
dc.identifier.wos 000365070700151
dc.identifier.pubmed 26569491
dc.contributor.department SE/AOK/K/I. Sz. Belgyógyászati Klinika
dc.contributor.institution Semmelweis Egyetem


Kapcsolódó fájlok:

A fájl jelenleg csak egyetemi IP címről érhető el.

Megtekintés/Megnyitás

Ez a rekord az alábbi gyűjteményekben szerepel:

Egyszerű nézet